2105 13704 Natural Language Processing 4 All NLP4All: A New Online Platform for Teaching and Learning NLP Concepts

Both groups of students differed in relevant covariates (age, instruction, subjects) that have not been controlled for. We finally examined in RQ2b to what extent human raters were also able to distinguish written reflections in the same way the machine did (based on text length and physics topics). Hence, document length and addressed physics topics relate to some extent to human judged text quality.

natural language processing for enhancing teaching and learning

You need to start understanding how these technologies can be used to reorganize your skilled labor. The next generation of tools like OpenAI’s Codex will lead to more productive programmers, which likely means fewer dedicated programmers and more employees with modest programming skills using them for an increasing number of more complex tasks. This may not be true for all software developers, but it has significant implications for tasks like data processing and web development. Until recently, the conventional wisdom was that while AI was better than humans at data-driven decision making tasks, it was still inferior to humans for cognitive and creative ones.

Full Article: Enhancing Learning and Classroom Experience with Natural Language Processing (NLP) Projects for Education

Assessments are crucial to measuring student progress and providing constructive feedback. However, the instructors have a huge workload, which leads to the application of more superficial assessments that, sometimes, does not include the necessary questions and activities to evaluate the students adequately. For instance, it is well-known that open-ended questions and textual productions can stimulate students to develop critical thinking and knowledge construction skills, but this type of question requires much effort and time in the evaluation process. Previous works have focused on automatically scoring open-ended responses based on the similarity of the students’ answers with a reference solution provided by the instructor. This approach has its benefits and several drawbacks, such as the failure to provide quality feedback for students and the possible inclusion of negative bias in the activities assessment.

This might be attributed to the higher familiarity of rater B with the context of written reflections and the standardized teaching situation. Note also that in any case the Cohen’s kappa values increased if only ratings were considered that were judged as certain by the raters (see second value in Table 6). This might be result from the fact that it is sometimes difficult, even impossible, to judge quality based on only five sampled sentences. (3) Even though we found significant group differences between physics and non-physics preservice teachers’ written reflections, we stress that these findings do not reflect the competencies of the students in the respective groups. We merely used the different populations to showcase potentials of the employed ML and NLP methods to enable formative assessment.

Reviewing Paper: FrugalGPT – The Lightning-Fast Machine Learning Solution

By using algorithms like topic modeling, entity recognition, and text summarization, NLP systems can help students quickly grasp the main ideas and key concepts from a text, improving their comprehension and critical thinking skills. Interactive chatbots powered by NLP engage students in real-time conversations, facilitating access to instant guidance and support. Educators can create immersive language learning environments using NLP techniques, enabling students to practice and improve their language skills.

natural language processing for enhancing teaching and learning

This data helps educators identify areas where students may be struggling, address their concerns, and create personalized learning experiences that cater to their individual needs. With the advancement of technology, NLP has the potential to revolutionize education by enhancing learning experiences and transforming classrooms into interactive and engaging spaces. The best known natural language processing tool is GPT-3, from OpenAI, which uses AI and statistics to predict the next word in a sentence based on the preceding words. The latest version, called InstructGPT, has been fine-tuned by humans to generate responses that are much better aligned with human values and user intentions, and Google’s latest model shows further impressive breakthroughs on language and reasoning. These instructional factors seem to be intuitive, but do they really capture features of teaching aligned with human raters’ observations? For example, the classroom management factor has the strongest correlations with the behavior management dimensions in both CLASS and PLATO.

Unleash the Power of Amazon Comprehend in Building Your Custom Classification…

Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. To illuminate the concept better, let’s have a look at two of the most top-level techniques used in NLP to process language and information. Natural language processing enables computers to process what we’re saying into commands that it can execute.

  • Mann–Whitney-U rank sum test is oftentimes used in language analytics, because words and sentences are not normally distributed (Kelih and Grzybek, 2005).
  • The most visible advances have been in what’s called “natural language processing” (NLP), the branch of AI focused on how computers can process language like humans do.
  • NLP-based plagiarism detection tools help educators identify instances of plagiarism in student assignments and research papers, promoting academic integrity and encouraging critical thinking and research skills.
  • Follow up research should evaluate to what extent transfer across tasks is also possible with these pretrained language models.

Reliability was less satisfactory for the journal data, possibly because the questions in the original journal format did not elicit the kind of thinking we were coding” (p. 27). In the discussion, the authors suggest a multi-dimensional coding manual to cope with coding issues. In sum, accurate and reliable manual coding of natural language processing for enhancing teaching and learning reflections was difficult, because language in general is ambiguous and human raters’ project-intern expertise might be necessary. Given these challenges, Leonhard and Rihm (2011) content that their content analyses (i.e., reaching human interrater agreement and developing a coding manual) were not scalable across contexts.

Understand how you might leverage AI-based language technologies to make better decisions or reorganize your skilled labor.

Noticing and reasoning about these topics arguably requires more physics knowledge and would be more characteristic for expert-like written reflections. Quantitative differences in topic proportions between the groups were calculated with Mann–Whitney-U rank sum tests. Mann–Whitney-U rank sum test is oftentimes used in language analytics, because words and sentences are not normally distributed (Kelih and Grzybek, 2005). Given the Bonferroni correction for multiple tests, p values smaller than 0,003 (i.e., 0,05/19) can be considered significant. We found that the longer reflections included significantly more physics-specific topics (see Table 5). Educational applications differ in many ways, however, from the types of applications for which NLP systems are typically developed.

natural language processing for enhancing teaching and learning

Three independent raters (including the first author) received a spreadsheet with the 5 sampled sentences for the 40 different written reflections. Rater A was the first author and knew the proportions (each 50%) of lower and higher scored segments. Raters B and C were researchers (graduate students) involved in the project and knew the observed teaching situation, but not the proportions.

cool information technology careers to consider.

The physics preservice teachers wrote more expert-like, e.g., they included more physics-specific topics, wrote on average longer and more coherent reflections. Expert teachers notice more learning-relevant events when observing, given that they have a more elaborate professional knowledge base for interpretation (Chan et al., 2021). Experts’ writing is also more coherent, given, among others, their elaborate knowledge base (Kellogg, 2008). Our findings mirror these findings for the particular context of reflecting on a physics teaching situation in a video vignette. This clustering approach alongside the coherence metric can be well used as formative assessment tools.

Ullmann (2019) argued that human resources available in teacher training programs are a major bottleneck to provide preservice teachers opportunities for feedback on their reflection. It would now be possible to use document length and the physics-specific topics as quality indicators for automated, formative assessment purposes. To avoid that human raters use document length as a proxy criterion for their quality rating, we rather randomly sampled five sentences from each reflection. Table 6 shows to what extent the human ratings agreed with the results of the ML model ratings. This can be expected given that rater A knew the relevant criteria (document lengths, and physics topics) that were used to score the texts. Rater B’s agreement with the ML-based score was, however, higher compared to raters C and D.

Identify your text data assets and determine how the latest techniques can be leveraged to add value for your firm.

Moreover, science experts’ content knowledge tends to be well interconnected and coherent (Koponen and Pehkonen, 2010; Nousiainen and Koponen, 2012). This knowledge base, among others, allows expert science teachers to notice relevant classroom events and interpret them (Todorova et al., 2017; Chan et al., 2021). Novice science teachers, on the other hand, oftentimes lack the adequate professional knowledge to notice the substance of students’ responses (Hume, 2009; Levin et al., 2009; Talanquer et al., 2015; Sorge et al., 2018).